| I looked up Slovakia data specifically. Deaths:
2020: 59,000 [1]
2019: 52,234 [2]
2018: 53,914 [2] So a 9.4% increase from 2018 to 2020. By contrast, Sweden had a 5.7% increase. [3] Slovakia has lockdown and curfew. Isn't the conclusion here that lockdown in Europe is failure, when with only voluntary measures Sweden was able to achieve a lower death rate? [1]https://spectator.sme.sk/c/22594536/in-2020-slovakia-suffere...
[2]https://countryeconomy.com/demography/mortality/slovakia
[3]https://www.statista.com/statistics/525353/sweden-number-of-... It seems implausible that lockdowns in Slovakia have achieved anything - by contrast lockdown may be contributing to deaths since people are not seeking regular medical care: https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-lockdown-may-have-ind... |
As to you new point - you are drawing your conclusions from disparate data sources, whilst ignoring confounding factors (as pointed out by ljf). The data on wikipedia give a less dramatic picture, and after adjusting for population things look even less dramatic (10.0 -> 10.8 per 1000 for Slovakia and 9.0 -> 9.5 for Sweden). I don't think you can draw serious conclusions from such limited data.