|
|
|
|
|
|
by Denvercoder9
1912 days ago
|
|
|
> The GPL merely requires a license at least as permissive as it. No, it requires a license that's at least as permissive as it AND that imposes the same obligations (i.e. source distribution, etc.) on the licensee. Dual-licensing dependent software under the GPL and MIT only ensures that you can rip out the GPL dependency, and then use the (formerly) dependent software under MIT. The whole package is still GPL and imposes the same obligations on derivatives of the package. |
|
|