Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by alexashka 1914 days ago
It's interesting to read blogs, they almost universally make these leaps of faith that x implies y without noticing that they do it and spend the rest of the time operating on these faith-based assumptions.

Let me give a couple of examples from this blog:

Software devs had anti-capitalist values -> free software -> unintended consequences -> customer is the product

Do you see where the leap of faith occurred? The last arrow. If you're young and you don't know, when app stores on mobile phones started and apps got built, most of them weren't free. When facebook got started, it was free, but it had nothing to do with anti-capitalist values, etc.

Another example:

employers want people who are passionate -> do open source to prove your passion

Where's the leap of faith? The initial premise. Let me give another example that'll perhaps illustrate: when women get polled about what they look for in a man, they say: sense of humor.

Does anyone take that seriously? No, right? We know people are full of shit and say one thing and mean another? Well, not people who write blogs or comment on twitter a lot of the time!

So much of blogging and twittering, is taking false premises or helping start new ones (first example). Guys/gals, I can forgive people who have never heard of A implies B in their lives. You have, please check that A = true and A actually implies B, every step of the way.

Apply mental-tests to your own thinking - it's great that you get software to compile, please get your view of the world to compile to a level a random stranger on the internet can't tear apart within 10 seconds.

1 comments

Not sure why you got the downvotes. The article in its entirety is a grand non sequitur. Observations. Rambling. "I don't know. Be dispassionate."
As usual, lightly downvoted comments on HN usually have more value than comments which get upvoted. The community has poor choices about how it votes here.