Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by snowwolf 1914 days ago
A lot of their problems seem to come down to the fact that they aren't experienced in vaccines so have made multiple missteps along the way because of that on the procedural side of things.

Their choice as partner for the Oxford vaccine was purely political. Merck were originally the preferred choice (and they have a lot of vaccine experience) and a deal was almost done, but the UK vetoed it because all production would be in the US and they wouldn't offer the guarantees the UK had gotten from Oxford as part of their funding of the Vaccine development.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/jan/29/we-had-to-go...

1 comments

If it was all in the US then none would have been exported to either UK or EU?

Seems like a good call.

Definitely. The EU had the same opportunity with BioNTech which was funded by Germany. But they allowed a partnership with Pfizer and now the US gets most of that production.