[dgellow]

If you continue, just after the bloc you quoted:

> Because JITs must warm up when an application starts, they have trouble improving TTI and may even hurt TTI. Also, a JIT adds to native code size and memory consumption, which negatively affects our primary metrics. A JIT is likely to hurt the metrics we care about most, so we chose not to implement a JIT.

So it seems to be specific to their TTI (Time To Interact) metric. A server application generally has the time to warm-up to reach best-performances (pretty common in the java world for example) while a mobile application has to react to user inputs as soon as possible.

[amelius]

Does this mean that V8 (which uses a JIT compiler) is a bad fit for web browsers?

I think they exaggerate:

> A JIT is likely to hurt the metrics we care about most

And they ruled out the possibility of having both a JIT and ahead of time compilation.

[jiofih]

Probably to limit scope / complexity. Remember that the JS engine here (in React Native) is basically pulling strings to orchestrate a bunch of native modules, not doing any of the heavy lifting. It’s quite different from the current web environment.

[Zababa]

V8 has an interpreter (Ignition) and a JIT (TurboFan) [1] but can be used without the JIT: https://v8.dev/blog/jitless

[_0w8t]

If JS code is few event listeners to verify/massage the data to submit to the server, then the answer is yes. But for more complex web pages the answer is now. For example, React on web and similar framework may not be feasible without JIT.

[sime2009]

V8 also has an interpreter which runs first while code is being compiled or has yet to be identified as a JIT candidate.

[ridiculous_fish]

Hermes does have a tier 1 JIT, though it is not a primary focus yet.

[albntomat0]

Do you have more information on this? I remember looking into it a couple months ago, and being told the jit wasn’t going to be developed further. Thanks!