Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by WildParser 1910 days ago
I recently experimented with a ram disk. Practically it didn't change anything.

OS-caching seems to already be clever enough and once the OS has figured out that some directories are important anything in there seemed to get done in RAM anyway.

A RAM-disk will make this less black box and more deterministic regarding guaranteed access times, but in daily use the RAM-disk just didn't make a difference.
1 comments
ghusbands 1910 days ago
Which OS? And were you already on SSD? Those can both greatly influence the outcome.
link
WildParser 1909 days ago
I'm on Windows. Other OS may differ. I experimented a lot with load times - and compared HDD, SSD, RAM-Disk.

I wrote a small program that loads everything from a big code-repository into RAM. The first time HDD and SSD and RAM-Disk make a big difference, when reading files a second time the lag of HDD (50s?) almost disappeared completely. Caching kicked in.

The RAM-Disk has less initial lag, but also it has to be filled first, so instead of moving everything to RAM-Disk just touching everything so the OS-Caching kicks in is just faster and more convenient.

link