| > You haven't provided any evidence that the statistical evidence is all based on false premises Analyses on the web have shown this though, and often discredited the credentials of the folks making the claims as well. Worth looking into if you care about the facts of the matter at all, as you claim to. I'm explaining why it doesn't give me pause. I've looked into them, have you? Or are you basing your opinion that they're valid on what you wish was true? > what you see is what half the country thinks of when they see the election results Less than half of the US, and likely falling over time as the election falls into the rearview mirror. And this is just more smoke/fire noise. > There were serious documented issues around the 2020 election and the site collates evidence of that. No, that site documents allegations, none of it stands up to any analysis. > Think for a second back to 2016 and disturbing claims of Russian interference. That is what Republican voters feel like today. You mean the Russian interference that the Mueller report said almost certainly happened, but just couldn't be tied to Trump? And the investigations that several Trump allies actually went to jail over? I wouldn't be crowing about how great that looks if I were you. > The shoe is on the other foot and now is your chance It's not my chance to do anything. I'm not a democrat, I'm not even American. I'm just pointing out high-volume bullshit where I see it. (edit - I mean come on - even in the article from the first "statistical" link on that site - https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pennsylvania-republi... It explains in the text that the data used to make the claim was not up to date. That page is a collection of garbage, made to look like it has substance by sheer volume. It's awful.) |