[Nursie]

> it must absolutely be defensible to highly criticize this corporation

She did more than criticise though, she made testable claims that she had evidence of fraud, that the machines were in the control of foreign powers and a variety of other things. Some were absurd, but they go beyond either opinion or criticism.

(to my reading, though I am neither a lawyer nor American, and I understand claims about damaging speech are much harder to make stick in the US. It would be hilarious and sad if dominion found a way to sue her in London...)