|
|
|
|
|
by gumby
1915 days ago
|
|
Really depends on your definition of "merit" (which is frequently misunderstood the same way evolutionary "fitness" is often misunderstood). Read Young's original book coining the term: it was both a satire and dystopian lament. Far from a term of approval! Certainly many people -- perhaps most -- believe that "IQ" (loosely defined) is in fact the proper definition of meritocracy. (In case it's not obviously I definitely disagree) |
|
It's all well and good if you're smart because it increases your advantage two-fold. But it basically screws over everyone else.