|
|
|
|
|
by pmiller2
1917 days ago
|
|
Then, why wasn't evidence uncovered earlier? Surely the theory had just as much plausibility a year ago as today. Are you asking me to believe a theory for which all the evidence was either not uncovered or destroyed? Why is that more plausible than origin from outside the lab? |
|
I agree that conclusions should not be drawn without evidence - but by the same token, you cannot rule this out as a possibility because no effort was put into investigating it.