|
|
|
|
|
|
by torstenvl
1907 days ago
|
|
|
Yes, it obviously did. > Watson was involved in campaigning for legislation in 2017 that went some way to stopping pubs from being converted into shops under permitted development rules – full planning permission is now required. This conversation will never be productive so long as you keep lying. |
|
|
Taking a break from HN, as this place is full of awful people who support arbitrary interference and control by local government of private property. It's hard to imagine having anything in common with people who support this kind of theft: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26532304
That didn't last long, did it?
Quoting single lines out of context doesn't make you right. Other commenters here have explained to you repeatedly various aspects of the relevant UK planning permission. Your sealioning is as obvious and childish as your hissy fit.
The developer did something that was illegal without permission. They knew it was illegal when they did it. They got caught and ordered to put it back. It was illegal to do that without permission on the day they bought the property. They bought the property knowing full well that it would be illegal to do that without planning permission. They did it anyway.
You spouting crap about other things that happened after they bought the property changes nothing. You quoting something about an irrelevant change to the law that doesn't apply in this case is just you spouting crap.
I now invite you to have another hissy fit.