|
|
|
|
|
by karmakaze
1919 days ago
|
|
I don't know if I've seen this video before, but the way it describes and animates the concepts is the best one yet. I have two thoughts that I haven't really seen discussed: 1. c isn't a limiting speed, it's the only speed through spacetime. Is there anything that isn't traveling at c through spacetime? 2. If everything is traveling at c through spacetime, then the all the spacetime dimensions are not in fact independent, so we live in 3 dimensions of spacetime. Given that why do we doubt or debate a holographic view of the universe? It's saying we live in 2D space and 1 time which is an interpretation of living in 3D spacetime. |
|
2. The dimensions are still independent. There are a total of five terms in the equation I just gave: ds (spacetime interval), dt (time), and dx (which is the three terms of space). You can express any one in terms of the others, leaving you with four independent variables.
The holographic view is a different phenomenon, derived from a basic integration of QM with GR (semiclassical gravity). It relies on the way black holes are complete information traps, so that only the surface area (and not the volume) are meaningful. (All of the information in it has to pass through the surface and nothing inside matters.) It also requires that energy be quantized; otherwise you get the dimension back via the infinite degrees of freedom of each particle.
So yes, you do get 3D spacetime, but only by completely rearranging everything. It doesn't pop directly out of general relativity. GR still requires 4 numbers to place any event.