[samatman]

vi and emacs were released in the same year.

The fact that vi iMproved became the dominant implementation isn't particularly relevant here.

[BeetleB]

> The fact that vi iMproved became the dominant implementation isn't particularly relevant here.

I think it is. Most vim users I know have never used vi and would hate it.

As a reminder: In vi, when you go into "insert" mode, you cannot edit anything prior to where the cursor was when you entered insert mode. vim got rid of such annoyances.

[samatman]

The topic of discussion was:

> If emacs adopted vim-like keybindings early on

I consider it obvious that "vim-like" keybindings are also "vi-like" keybindings, and that emacs could in fact have adopted them before the invention of vim.

It wouldn't have of course; when the Editor Wars were truly raging, the modal vs. modeless debate was at the heart of the partisanship. But that's a separate question.

[mattl]

Are vim users going to be able to use vi? Genuine question. I’ve barely used either.

[colordrops]

Yes, vim is a superset of vi