|
|
|
|
|
by steveklabnik
1913 days ago
|
|
It wasn't suggested that it be Tokio, it was suggested that it be a minimal one, that could get you started without needing to make big choices before you even begin. (And yes, portability would have to be a part of that story.) |
|
That said, I think no matter how minimal it is it would still be a mistake. If anything, I think the only thing that would make sense to include is basically a "not-really-async" executor to appease things like the sibling thread where people want to be able to incorporate async code into their sync codebase without spawning a reactor thread. But that would also require the ability to genericize libraries over executors (and would obviously come with some significant caveats around potential deadlocks).