| > the only evidence we do have available indicates that monopoly abuse of power is a tactic Apple has deliberately used before. Yes, they fell foul of anti-trust law in Ebook pricing. > Even if this is, as RileyJames posits, just the head of one team asking another for a favor in pursuit of an acquisition, That’s just a made up explanation. It’s not ‘evidence’. > it speaks to the corporate culture at Apple. There is no evidence for this at all. Remember, it’s just something a commenter made up. It’s not information about Apple, so it can’t ‘speak to Apple’s culture’. > Regardless, given the balance of actual evidence, it seems more absurd to extend the benefit of the doubt to the corporation that has abused market power in the past. At least you are clear about what you are actually saying: You are going to assume Apple is guilty of this because they violated antitrust law over ebook pricing*, and that is your only evidence. We have no evidence that they are guilty of this. Maybe something will show up in court. |