Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by noir_lord 1915 days ago
> including the backups coming in from customers.

Which are encrypted in flight...if they aren't then anyone on the 30 machines between customer and final destination can also see the backups coming in from customers.

1 comments

True, but the packets in-flight can take different routes. If you have a machine on the switch, you know you've captured all the packets that were in-flight. This make it easier to break the encrypted packets.

It's a choice--everything in security is a risk-management assessment, but I'm surprised rsync.net was able to get so many security certifications with this setup.

> If you have a machine on the switch, you know you've captured all the packets that were in-flight.

Same applies if someone takes over the firewall, machine on the last hop before they hit port 22.

In a world where stuff like this https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2020/09/01/zero-day-cisco-en... routinely happens there is a benefit to forgoing all of that when it makes sense.

# tcpdump -i eth0

tcpdump: eth0: You don't have permission to capture on that device

(socket: Operation not permitted)