|
|
|
|
|
by jpdaigle
1921 days ago
|
|
A counter-argument I've read to the dark forest theory is that: * spectroscopic analysis can show that our atmosphere is oxygen-rich, and this can be detected from a range of many light-years away
* oxygen-rich atmospheres probably indicate life
* we've had an oxygen-rich atmosphere for hundreds of millions of years So, yes, radio wave emissions have only been going on for 100 years, but we've looked like a life-bearing planet for 100s of millions of years and nobody's taken a successful extinction shot at us that we know of. |
|
Is it though? We only have one example of "life" and that is an oxygen based form. Supposing all forms of life are similar is something I consider unproven.
It might be more accurate to say an "unusual" planetary chemistry is indicative of an unusual process, which might include life. But then the question is: How many planets are there with unusual chemistry? I think we are far from observing this - the many planets we now suppose to exist are only just being discovered, starting with the largest, the hottest, and the nearest.