|
|
|
|
|
by donatj
1922 days ago
|
|
Rose tinted glasses I suspect. Don’t forget in the 90s the average desktop wasn’t powerful enough to run Java at a decent speed and the JVM startup time was in the tens of seconds. It’s never told as such, but having been around at the time I suspect JS came to be largely from Java’s lackluster performance. I’d go so far as to say if the web had depended on client side Java it may never have taken off. |
|
It also had to do with Java's availability being hit or miss - a lot of times, you'd have to jump through some hoops to enable Java support, whereas Javascript always worked.