Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tirumaraiselvan 1917 days ago
> Any reason you couldn't replace "Postgres" with "a database"

You could! But you would need ideal concurrency semantics.

> I didn't find anything Postgres specific other than maybe "SELECT FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED" which you can do without

You mean using some equivalent way to achieve "SELECT FOR UPDATE SKIP LOCKED" ?

1 comments

Using some equivalent, yes