[ddingus]

How exactly does one create designs of their own without importing? How do they have others design for them without importing?

Secondly, the data involved in the entire process being open means we don't have to talk about these silly things. And that is what an unlimited looks like.

Actual open machines that take open data, are limited. Ones that are not open, that do not take open data are in fact quite Limited.

And I didn't say anything about legal. It probably is, and I'm sure they're team vetted it too.

I am all for revisiting what is legal and what is not, and or how we value things so Market forces determine that in a better way too. I don't care how it goes.

I care very much about machines being limited by software.

And be really clear, if there is preferred software for use with the machine, and it adds some real value of some kind, that's all fine and good. The perfectly Fair way to compete, and people will benefit from that value.

That isn't what's going on here.

The fact that the operation data stream isn't open, creates artificial value, but they're trading on. That'll ultimately comes at the expense of anyone who bought into this.

The real standard should be a decade from now someone finds one of these in a dumpster fixes it up and can drive it with whatever tools they feel like to make the data that they need.

Meta: I use voice input on this one sorry for the random capitalization typos.

[Johnny555]

How exactly does one create designs of their own without importing them?

I'm not a Cricut user, but Cricut said:

“Any project created within Design Space with images or fonts found in Design Space can be modified and do not count as a personal image upload. If users want to use images from other applications, such as a .jpg or .png, and upload those images to Design Space, that counts as a personal image upload.”

And I didn't say anything about legal. It probably is, and I'm sure they're team vetted it too.

Then I think we're arguing the same point -- what Cricut did is bad, but probably legal and well within their rights and it is what happens when people embrace closed platforms without understanding the drawbacks.

It's the same thing that leads people to buy $80 inkjet printers that only work with DRM'ed inkjet cartridges that cost $60 for a set of cartridges that contain $3 worth of ink.

[ddingus]

Yeah for what it's worth I don't buy those shitty printers either.

My favorite printer of all time with a PostScript printer my tektronix, made later by Xerox. You could literally FTP a PostScript file to it. And it without put a page. Loved it.

Printers pissed me off so much I don't currently own one. And I have a need coming up so I'm shopping around for some open basic printer that I can get used, or even pay a little more for new, that doesn't hassle me in these ways, and that can be driven with relatively open data.

Otherwise, it's cheaper just by few pages down then, or print where there printers available and deal. Which is exactly what I've done.

[ddingus]

Ultimately, work done that way is work done entirely within the scope and limitation of their software.

Ask anyone in design about how good those kinds of solutions are. There's a lot better software out there for doing design work. That makes all of what you put here a very severe limitation on how useful the machine actually is.