|
|
|
|
|
by toyg
1916 days ago
|
|
> In Linux land, GTK is an especially bad offender. That's has always been the case, even before mobile was a thing. GTK components have always been padded to the wazoo, and pretty badly too; it's one of the reasons I was very much a "KDE guy" back in the early '00s, QT component just looked and scaled so much better. If only QT had had a C implementation, GTK would never have reached a tenth of its popularity. |
|
Agree that Qt would be more popular with a C implementation. The myriad language bindings available for GTK have gone a long way in boosting its popularity.