|
|
|
|
|
by another_comment
1926 days ago
|
|
>> I think it might be time to define a new metric that more closely reflects the actual cost of living. We had different inflation stats back in the day. The US government has been slowly changing them. This guy uses the old official methodology to calculate inflation today. He gets way higher inflation using the old methodology and plugging in todays numbers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadowstats.com There is a lot of controversy here, but I think inflation is definitely higher than reported. |
|
I don't, and it's pretty straightforward why. You can argue about how high inflation was over the past year and about technical details. But if you think it's significantly and systematically off and has been for a long time, then it would compound and make a big difference.
Back when my sense of "normal" prices was established, a pound of spaghetti was a dollar. The official total amount of inflation in the last twenty years was a little over 50% or a little over 2% a year. I'm confident the official figures are in the ballpark, because if inflation had really been say 5%, then spaghetti would be twice the price it is.
Car prices are also a useful benchmark. A Honda Civic EX is a pretty standard unit of transportation. In 2001, it was $17350, and in 2021, $25495. That's an increase of about 47% vs. official CPI went up about 50%. And notice that we're not accounting for any sort of improvement in the product, such as all the safety equipment, more horsepower, etc. So you can't complain about "hedonic" adjustments.
A funny thing on the Wikipedia page on Shadowstats is:
"Shadowstats has not changed its $175 per year subscription fee since at least 2006"
If there's so much inflation, how come the price of reading about it hasn't gone up?