|
|
|
|
|
by samatman
1920 days ago
|
|
I'm opposed to the use of rBGH. Stating falsehoods doesn't help the cause. The absence of evidence that rBGH ends up in milk isn't for lack of trying to find it. I get organic milk because it tastes better. I suspect that means it's more nutritious, and further suspect that's because of the growth hormone, not the absence of some pesticides (but not others!) in the feed. To preemptively correct a misconception which many people have: nutrition labels are based on what the government legally allows producers to claim, it isn't the result of some test performed on the food inside the package. Just like a huge tomato doesn't have much more lycopene than a smaller one with the same genetics, it makes sense to me that most of the increased lactation from rBGH is just water. Might be bad for the cows too, I mean I doubt it's good for them. But I consider it cheating and think we'd be better off without it. |
|
Organic milk is often UHT pasteurized which gives it a slightly scalded flavor. That might be what your tasting, rather than any nutritional difference.