Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by kissickas 1931 days ago
The claim isn't that Telegram's encryption is worse, it's that Telegram's closed-source backend is unauditable.

Your other points are a great example of FUD.

edit: changed clients to backend

2 comments

For all practical purposes, Signal's backend is also closed source. The public repository for the server code hasn't been updated since April 2020 (nearing a year now) though Signal has, in the meantime, come up with features like new groups that necessitate storing more metadata on its servers.
I think Telegram clients are open source, aren't they?
You're right, edited. Thanks!