|
|
|
|
|
|
by clarkevans
1925 days ago
|
|
|
> Given that the main software is AGPL, the extensions would also be open source. This is not necessarily true. If you are the sole copyright owner, you can have your main product be AGPL and sell proprietary extensions; there's no reason why you need to enforce your copyright against yourself. Alternatively, your combined product could be under a proprietary license that is not the AGPL. |
|
|