|
|
|
|
|
|
by AlotOfReading
1924 days ago
|
|
|
This is a controversial, and in my opinion (as an archaeologist), a rather incorrect definition. It's certainly the traditional one, but most archaeologists today don't use it because of all the theoretical issues it would entail, like Europeans "bringing history" in 1492 to an entire continent when nothing about the nature of our sources changes at that time. I've worked on both sides of the "writing line" and frankly, the process is very much the same in most cases. |
|
|