Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by SomewhatLikely 1932 days ago
Self-replication doesn't seem necessary. A human who is infertile is clearly still living. Worker ants who can't reproduce would also be well within the living side of the spectrum to me. I give these examples because it seems to me the definition of living should apply at the individual level, not the species. Individuals after all are the ones doing the dying.
3 comments

replication is still happening in the lower cellular/molecular scales, even when the aggregate organismal level isn't reproducing that pattern. People who take these definitions very seriously aren't implying that elderly people aren't still alive :)
The infertile human still came from some fertile being.
What about cloneability?