|
|
|
|
|
by Koliakis
1930 days ago
|
|
Taiwan was quite successful with the policies they implemented to home-grow a semiconductor industry: https://www.nap.edu/read/10677/chapter/9 The entire chapter is interesting, but it also mentions how TSMC came to be: > The government came to realize that it did not yet have an industry—only one company. The private sector was still fearful of risk and could not raise enough money to start new firms. Once again the government put up money, this time to start TSMC. And this time it applied a condition: The government’s share would be less than 50 percent. Lacking enough funds from the private sector, the government made an offer to Philips, which put in almost 35 percent of the initial investment; this pushed the private sector’s share above 50 percent, and TSMC was born. Again, the technology and all the people came from ERSO, including about 130 engineers, the 2-micron CMOS developed at ERSO, and its latest 6-inch-wafer fab. TSMC had no product, only the fab technology, which matched well with the idea of a pure-play foundry. I don't get why Europe is so bad at this kind of thing. |
|
The EU is a conglomerate of 20+ hyperbureaucratic states where the incentive is to drag these initiatives for years and billions, get nowhere, and repeat. A lot of people will make a lot of money, regardless the outcome.