|
|
|
|
|
by bsmith89
1922 days ago
|
|
I could be misunderstanding, but I think the problem with this approach is the lack of permanent identity. What's a "supermajority"? Could I get it by making a bunch of fake identities and having them all "trust" me? Alternatively, we could ask for a supermajority of coins, and then I think we've re-invented proof-of-stake. |
|