Basically, the USA has strategic interests in Muslim countries. They therefore maintain a military presence there. There is a lot of fighting going on in those places, which means that sometimes the military is forced to respond, people get killed, sometimes. These accidents keep happening because the conflicts are ongoing.
By the way, can you show statistics to back up your claims?
Yes, but I also think it is harder when the accidents are foreseen. The United States doesn't take repeated military actions with the rational expectation that there won't be these accidental killings of civilians, so because they are foreseen, they are arguably intended.
Exactly, they are not ideologically bent on persecuting groups of people. Therefore, if people get killed, they can be attributed to errors of judgement.
The people in my high school graduating class in 2005 who joined the armed forces were very excited to be given the opportunity to "kill a bunch of sand ni**rs". They didn't get that mentality out of nowhere.
It's literally empirical, you just might not argue it's conclusive.
But ultimately I'm not going to be gaslit into this weird idea that you're pushing that the US armed forces don't have a racial component to the massive amounts of deaths they've created, when I've seen that with my own eyes.
At some point you have to wonder why all these accidents keep happening, and why they always serve US geopolitical interests.