[izolate]

> It’s obvious MS and any other company that compensates similarly is included when stating “FAANG”

Then why is faang.io using a strict definition of FAANG? I think a loose definition is preferable, but clearly that's not a universally-held opinion.

[lotsofpulp]

That is a good point, I guess I'm just used to seeing it in discussions where the context is distinguishing companies with high pay and valuable RSUs versus others.