Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nikisweeting 1931 days ago
That will change when cosmetics can be shared across multiple games, which is already starting to grow with the onset of custom multi-game avatar+identity APIs being provided to game developers.

When you avatar persists across multiple different games, it makes sense to have an ownership mechanism that isn't managed by a single central authority.
1 comments
echelon 1931 days ago
What economic incentive to game developers have to respect NFT ownership? Or anyone, for that matter?

In VRChat, you can be any model.

If I had a game, I wouldn't care who owned the NFT. It's not a value add. As far as I'm concerned, anybody could use it.

link
nikisweeting 1930 days ago
The incentive is that the players care about it, and players will actively choose games that respect their avatar/NFT ownership because it allows them to show off their prized avatar and share their persona with a larger audience.
link
echelon 1930 days ago
Okay, but that doesn't mean companies will have economic incentive to support decentralization.

Games don't honor any fiat currency or stocks I hold, any unlocks I made on other platforms, or my Reddit upvotes.

This is going to go nowhere.

link
nikisweeting 1929 days ago
Game platforms have been providing cross-game "unlocks" / achievements for years, and they're only moving more towards that (this is one of the whole reasons for Epic, Riot, etc. shipping their own launchers, it gives them a runtime on the client where they can securely share state between games).

It's going to be huge for VR in particular:

- https://www.roadtovr.com/getting-social-oculus-unifying-mult...

- https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8845288

link