|
|
|
|
|
|
by soneil
1934 days ago
|
|
|
That was my first thought too - most the article is about remediation of the site - cabling, foundations, etc. It seems sensible to me that you'd refresh an existing site rather than paying for a full remediation and then developing a new site elsewhere. (Saving both the remediation costs, and the initial development/infrastructure/groundworks/planning at a replacement site) |
|
|