[chmod775]

I mean... yes? Just pre-installing/enabling some parental control filter on phones is way cheaper than even losing out on a few millions worth of sales.

It's pretty trivial to do since those filters already exist.

It will probably end with retailers having to do that at the time of sale, but still, it's perfectly possible.

[reissbaker]

Doing that when building these devices at scale and handling support queries for it is probably not cheap. Most phone manufacturers don't allow retailers to tamper with the software on the phones/tablets (that opens up a can of worms in terms of security), so they'd have to do it very early, maybe even at the factory — which means earmarking which devices are bound to Utah. Responsible manufacturers (e.g. Apple) would also have to audit the filter code, or build it themselves.

It gets even worse for Utah, though. The bill demands that any device activated in Utah comply with the law — not merely sold in Utah. So manufacturers would need to turn on location tracking and make it impossible to disable, for all users in the world, just to detect the corner case that they happen to be in Utah, so that they can silently turn on a Utah-specific porn filter.

I doubt the bill will pass, but if it does, I doubt many manufacturers would comply.

[mywittyname]

> I doubt the bill will pass, but if it does, I doubt many manufacturers would comply.

They'd probably comply. Most could strike a deal with an existing company to provide software for this. Hell, more than likely a company who makes such software is probably a campaign contributor to many of the supporters of this bill.

AFAIK, the law doesn't define how effective the filter must be. So any good-faith attempt is probably more than enough. Even if the software is just a skin of Chrome with a add-on installed that blocks a list of websites.

I won't lie though, I would find it hilarious if foxnews.com was put into this obscenity filter.

[imwillofficial]

Every single phone manufacturer sans apple allows this. Ever heard of Verizon bloat ware? And yes, they will comply, 1) it’s the law, and 2) they won’t leave money on the table.

[reissbaker]

Device manufacturers don't have to follow random Utah laws: they can simply not sell phones in Utah and not have corporate operations there. Utah has 3 million people, it's not exactly a major population center. There are many cities in the world with more people than Utah.

And I'm pretty sure "Verizon bloatware" is not installed at point of sale. What would stop a random employee from installing keyloggers? This stuff is centrally managed.

They'd very likely be losing money by complying with such a law. They wouldn't be leaving money on the table, they'd be taking it off the table.

[imwillofficial]

Sure, they don’t have to. They will however.