|
|
|
|
|
by Qwertious
1936 days ago
|
|
>What happened to the HN rule of "interpret everything with the most positive interpretation possible", when this is the top voted comment ? What makes you think this comment is doing anything except providing positive feedback? >It seems pretty obvious that the author doesn't intend to coerce anyone into doing anything. Subtext is weird and dangerous. Using more accurate phrasing costs nothing and potentially averts problems. |
|
It doesn't address any of the points mentioned in the article, and in fact, doesn't address the general theme of the article.
There is no subtext at all, the article is simple and clear, and one would be hard pressed to think that the author is trying to force anyone to do anything while reading it.