[nickez]

Can you imagine a world where you could only use a specific phone model with a specific operator? or where you could only send text messages to people that is on the same network? If we can regulate phones we should be able to regulate social networks.

[lultimouomo]

When the iPhone originally came out in the US it was locked together with a 2 year contract with AT&T.

[karatinversion]

(Deleted my identical but less detailed comment)

Then again, this was never the case in the EU, where bundling handsets with a GSM subscription was banned.

But yes, we don’t have to imagine - and the change certainly didn’t come out of the goodness of the carrier’s hearts!

[progval]

> this was never the case in the EU, where bundling handsets with a GSM subscription was banned.

It is not: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIM_lock#European_Union

Last time I was looking for a phone (~8 years ago), in France, I had to check which ones were simlocked.

[Too]

Usually you had he option at least. Either fork up full price for unlocked phone, or take the subsidized monthly rental of phone with a locked SIM.

And while the second option does lock you into one operator for 12-24 months you still had the choice of which operator to tie yourself to, I don't think I ever saw a phone model only available on single provider.

Finally no matter which operator you chose you can still call people from other operators, even if they initially tried very hard to make this less pleasurable by allowing free texts and minutes within the operator.

[karatinversion]

Huh, I lived in two EU countries so thought it was Union law, but turned out the national law in the two just coincided!

[grishka]

And it took how long for people to figure out how to unlock it?

[nemothekid]

No amount of unlocking would have enabled you to use your iPhone in the second largest operator in the US; Verizon

[grishka]

Ah. Right. I always forget that the US is about the only country in the world where there still are widely used CDMA networks.