|
|
|
|
|
|
by JoshTriplett
1932 days ago
|
|
|
The main problem with this is that it misrepresents itself as an "Open Source" license, while not actually being Open Source. People can write and use a license with any restrictions they want; there are plenty of proprietary licenses out there. I hope such licenses don't get used or propagated by anyone else, but people are still free to write them. But it would be especially problematic if people use code under such a license, or worse, put new code under such a license, while thinking they're using an Open Source license. |
|
|