[fractallyte]

OK, yes, you're right. I'm just intensely irritated by the language of the article - and this, despite the tools being already available (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26339038)! Sentences like: „...a remnant of a colonial, supremacist paradigm. The music is colonized in some way“

To me, that's the wrong itch to scratch. Instead of creating composition tools that celebrate their own culture, and push music in new directions, they're trying to hit back against a perceived injustice.

[tobobo]

I think some context that might be helpful here is that European music theory really has spread throughout the world through colonialism, and is reinforced as the default in many ways and by many institutions.

For example, at almost any university in the US, European music theory will be taught in the mainline music curriculum classes, whereas musical systems of indigenous Americans will be taught in specialized classes or sidelined to an “ethnomusicology” curriculum, if it is taught at all. It’s hard to separate this from the history of how America was colonized.

This is a pattern that repeats itself throughout the world, helped both by “traditional” colonization as well as the economic colonization via the dominance of European and American products and cultural artifacts, including music and music software.

So, I don’t think it’s a stretch to say that the overwhelming conformity of music software to European musical patterns is a direct result of the age of European colonization that continues to have an impact both on music education as well as the software industry.