|
|
|
|
|
|
by bhaney
1928 days ago
|
|
|
Other way around I think. Your link is an old version of the paper. The one on eprint was just updated today with a version of the paper that adds the "destroys RSA" line and removes the "work in progress" line (put it in the wayback machine to see the version that was there yesterday without the claim of destroying RSA) |
|
|