[JuliusPullo]

I guess it's a good thing to have AP, youtube, CNN, etc. tell us that what we saw with our own eyes is not what we saw with our own eyes. That statistical impossibilities don't matter when the right candidate ends up winning. That asking questions is not allowed. I wish I could refer you to contrary views about the election, but as you've probably heard, anything different from the official version is banned for your own protection, like youtube banned Giuliani. Maybe you think this is a hurt right-winger writing, but believe me, it does not matter if your preferred candidate took the election or not, you must always demand clean elections. A government that is elected by means of fraud will not respect any of us, regardless of our ideals.

[totalZero]

AP does election projections. Give credit where it's due. I don't think you're a hurt right-winger, I think you might prefer to live in an echo chamber where any controverting evidence is shouted down rather than examined and considered. You made a statement with no evidence and yet you reject my response because apparently nothing from a media organization could ever be rock-solid.