It's a different approach, coupled to automating the desktop office ecosystem, whereas we're coupled to web-apps, and web APIs alone.
Secondly, it is more complicated, a bit more like Leapwork, whereas we're targeting Zapier-level complexity.
Axiom is already too complex for many people (it's why we mainly target these no-code Zapier types). We've seen every marginal % increase in complexity reduces the number of people who can build bots significantly.
Essentially, each RPA product has chosen a power vs ease-of-use trade-off for different segments. We're fixated on the Zapier / Airtable people, not the traditional desktop RPA people, whom I think Microsoft are targetting.
It's a different approach, coupled to automating the desktop office ecosystem, whereas we're coupled to web-apps, and web APIs alone.
Secondly, it is more complicated, a bit more like Leapwork, whereas we're targeting Zapier-level complexity.
Axiom is already too complex for many people (it's why we mainly target these no-code Zapier types). We've seen every marginal % increase in complexity reduces the number of people who can build bots significantly.
Essentially, each RPA product has chosen a power vs ease-of-use trade-off for different segments. We're fixated on the Zapier / Airtable people, not the traditional desktop RPA people, whom I think Microsoft are targetting.