Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by sib 1931 days ago
The economist's answer:

If that were so, there wouldn't be so much money spent on lobbyists by companies.

I guess there's a reason they call it "the dismal science."

1 comments

when something doesn't provide a reliable return on investment, they stop spending that money. that's how much you know something works, whether it's buying advertising or congressmen.
With the caveat that the ability to measure ROI exists and is also reliable. See for example advertising, and especially online programmatic targeted advertising: https://hbr.org/2013/03/did-ebay-just-prove-that-paid