|
|
|
|
|
by Leparamour
1931 days ago
|
|
I agree with the general of idea of learning high-demand skills, only I always found it to be a bit of a chicken and egg problem: I have no (interesting) problems to solve with VBA/Vim/Powershell/Keras/Never Split the Difference-style negotiation in my day-to-day work or not enough fantasy to conjure these up in my private studies. The lack of experience then disqualifies me for roles where I would be confronted with these (interesting) problems. Never understood how to learn intricate stuff inside a void of direct applicability |
|
The egg would be the effort you expend on that skill to meet the basic requirements of the interview for such jobs
The new chicken borne out of this would be you learning on the job and carrying on from the fundamentals you've learned to get the job