|
|
|
|
|
|
by mckirk
1927 days ago
|
|
|
Yes, that's what we have now though, isn't it? It went from having 0 pattern matching to having 1 pattern matching -- that seems like '100% more of this thing we are talking about' to me. This of course only makes sense if you see '1 pattern matching' as a precisely defined abstract construct, but I guess the 100%-more joke usually requires that perspective (and is a joke precisely because it's so non-sensical to think this way). |
|
|