Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by dmitrygr 1931 days ago
50Mbit, 28ms latency wireless link at 12km distance, and on a battery budget, eh? I'd love to hear more, I love science fiction.
5 comments

Ocusync has been out for some time now and it already sounds like magic. I think when compared to wifi or some radio bridges it usually operates in much less congested environment. Nonetheless, if you think about frequencies used, energy going down with r^2 and bandwidth they are doing, it's an amazing feat even in ideal conditions. And here's it's a moving object, on battery, with four electromagnets around it.
My son has a Mini2, the transmission range on this is pretty amazing.

We were watching a neighbor's house over the holiday, which meant mostly checking for delivery boxes on their porch and putting them inside. We could drive the Mini2 out the window of our house and 2 blocks away to check the porch without getting out of our seats. And this is a suburban area full of houses, trees, and a shit ton of interference at the wifi/4G/LTE ranges. The video never lost a frame.

Boasting about flying beyond line of sight without a spotter in a cluttered residential neighborhood isn't going to score you many points among the drone enthusiast crowd.
Heh, true. Thanks.
No worries. If there's just one thing I want to get across though, it's that as drone operators, we are collectively responsible for how the broader community views us and drones.

Random drones floating through neighborhoods is sketchy from a safety standpoint but also it tends to upset people, who often think that any drone they see is spying on them. Just a consideration.

Personally I like to fly around abandoned buildings and decrepit structures. Lots of interesting flying to be done and cool vids to be taken, and there's nobody around to complain :)

I'm super cautious like you but one thing about the Mini and Mini 2 is they don't attract much attention. They're really small and pretty darn quiet.

I've had my Mini about a year and have yet to have any interaction with strangers who see it flying.

This has been out for a few years in the form of the "DJI FPV" system, Goggles and Air Unit, for DIY drone construction. It's not science fiction - the latency and bitrate taper off a bit at range, but it genuinely works.

If you tear down the hardware, it's using an Imagination IE1000 802.11ac frontend, Skyworks amps, and a custom DJI image processor chip (marked P1). So the air protocol probably looks somewhat like 802.11ac (OFDM etc.) but without the framing overhead and presumably without TCP/IP.

They use frequency hopping also as far as I know.
I don't think so, at least not outside of the channel bandwidth - based on the FCC filings and the observed behavior, initialization seems to happen on 5839MHz (Channel 8) and then the device hops to a user-selected channel, where it seems to stay.
The goggles / video transmitter system has been around for awhile--DJI just hasn't made their own FPV-focused drone with them included yet.

6 mile range test: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4X8ExuJWt6E

50 Mbit is the maximum bandwidth it can do. It decreases with range which will result in degraded image quality.
Does it use WiMAX?