Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by zbyte64 1933 days ago
Would it be accurate to say that the "Vibration" or nuclear-spin flipping doesn't emit energy or is neutral in the thermodynamic sense?
3 comments

Spin waves are similar to vibrations (phonons) in a lot of respects, you still need energy to change a spin.

That said, some aspects of thermodynamics are counter-intuitive (well, actually most of it is). Vibrations are present even at 0 K because of the uncertainty principle, and that’s true for spin waves as well as actual vibrations. It does not mean that any energy is created. The difference with time crystals is that usually these vibrations don’t involve any symmetry breaking.

Time crystals are consistent with standard thermodynamics.

> Vibrations are present even at 0 K because of the uncertainty principle

Are you sure that's true? I can't remember the exact details but recall that being a common misinterpretation of the uncertainty principle

Yes it’s true. Kinetic energy is never exactly zero, that’s called zero-point energy. Perfect stillness does not exist at the atomic scale. It would involve knowing perfectly both positions and velocities (in case of atoms, the equivalent is true for spins).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy

If you could coax work out of it in a ground state, that would be a perpetual motion machine, so no, it had better not emit energy. But you could detect the spin flips to make a clock
I guess if it’s emitting energy then it’s not at the lowest energy state. The emitted energy draws the energy state down further.