|
|
|
|
|
by hisham_hm
1928 days ago
|
|
fredfoobar _was_ being facetious. By his comments such as [1] and [2] it's clear that he's trying to attack other things in the world that happen to be both useful and pollutant, and induce a parallel between them and bitcoin — his implicit argument being that bitcoin supposedly a net-positive beneficial thing in spite of the pollution it causes. Whenever someone counters that assumption, the mask falls off and he's back on the attack [3]. That does not invalidate the point that cars _are_ highly pollutant and shouldn't be the primary means of transportation in any sustainable society. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26319996
[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26319974
[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26319558 |
|