|
|
|
|
|
by tomjen3
5488 days ago
|
|
The problem with this is always that they are "a few years away", or that we can run the entire economy from biofuels "in ten to twenty years". It has been going on for what, 20 years now? It is never going to change until we ignore them until they actually bring about their ideas. |
|
http://inventors.about.com/od/timelines/a/Photovoltaics.htm http://greenecon.net/understanding-the-cost-of-solar-energy/... http://www.reddit.com/r/Frugal/comments/hn7jn/while_were_on_...
We could start building a 100% solar/nuclear solution in the US today. The technology is there, and it would only be the construction time. Our energy costs would go up, but not significantly. However, if the technology keeps on this curve, unsubsidized solar will be cheaper than coal soon.
We aren't doing this today because the power companies know that the curve is coming soon. Why invest prematurely, outside basic research projects?