|
|
|
|
|
|
by psychoTek
1939 days ago
|
|
|
It's quite reasonable. The terms of service have been spelt out in quite clear terms. She knew quite well what she was buying. She was quite happy when she was getting the benefits. Now that the shoe is on the other foot, she wants relief from the deal. The vendor provided both monitoring systems and notified it's customers. The company can't be responsible for stupid. This is what raw/laissez-faire capitalism is all about. |
|
|