[astrange]

That's more relative than absolute expectations, or maybe you just know a lot of neurotic people.

Even if climate change is as bad as WW2 (doubtful over the same time scale), people still had children then, and they still had children when every city was covered in a foot of horse poop, all your kids died at 14 and doctors didn't believe in handwashing. In fact they had more!

[imtringued]

As you have less children you put more resources into each child.

[astrange]

Aren't we talking about not having any kids at all here?

It takes a bit less than 3x resources to have 3 kids though, since they share things.

[m463]

also, children at some point might be might be like factorio, where the early ones start gathering resources for the later ones :)